The Supreme Court on Friday granted an emergency request to the Trump administration to revoke the release program of former President Biden, which has expanded the legal protection of hundreds of thousands of migrants from four Latin America countries.
He noted the second time when the Supreme Court has given way to the administration’s efforts to cancel a group of temporary legal status of migrants, part of the collapse of President Trump’s immigration, which caused the outbreak of lawsuits.
The judges in the majority did not explain their reasoning. Judges Sonia Sotomayor and Ketandzhi Brown Jackson, two of the three democratic appointed to the court, did not agree.
The duo stated that their colleagues did not look at the enormous harm of migrants whose lives would be put into limbs, risking their elimination from the country long before legal issues in the case reach a resolution – including the potential for the final victory of migrants, allowing them to stay in the United States
“This does not require anything from the government regarding irreparable harm. And it underestimates the pernicious consequences of enabling the government to raise life and livelihood of nearly half a million unborn, while their legal claims are in anticipation,” writes Jackson, annexed to Sotomayor.
“It is obvious that the government is striving for a stay to allow it to do maximum damage to the precursor.”
The lower courts had previously rejected the administration’s attempt to terminate the two-year conditional release of 532,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, stating that the Trump Interior Security Ministry failed to carry out the necessary examination of the case.
The Biden administration launches the conditional release program as a way to relieve border pressure.
Migrants from the four countries can apply in advance to enter the United States and be given a two -year work permit, as long as they provide a financial sponsor based on the United States.
But the program won the grips of Republicans who regarded it as an abuse of humanitarian conditional release, stating that the concept of refusing the requirements for those who otherwise cannot meet the standards of immigration should only be carried out on a limited, each case.
Trump also strives to cancel the temporary protective status (TPS) for both Venezuela and Haitians, with the Supreme Court tilted with Trump in raising a ruling judgment, which blocked him to terminate the deportation of about 300,000 Venezuelans.
However, there is a small pocket of discounts from GOP to the end of the two types of status.
All four countries contribute to the immigrant communities, which are fortresses from the Miami region, and a trio of South Florida legislators, GOP demanded the Trump administration to rethink the wholesale of both conditional and TPS, instead to cancel it on a case -by -case basis.
“I obviously understand what the president is doing and the administration is doing,” The Hill told The Hill.
“But the logic would tell you that you probably have a greater chance of having legitimate asylum claims if you come from places like Cuba, Venezuela.”
While the Supreme Court’s decision on Friday suspended a decision to defend the conditional discharge for the four countries, it does not raise an additional decision from the US District Judge Indira Talvani, which protects other types of conditional release from the Biden administration, including Afghanistans and Ukrainians.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material cannot be published, emitted, rewritten or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports and streaming video, focus on the hill.