Hegt and Rubio Roughly recognize a bomb

Two of Donald Trump’s best allies have admitted that a bombing for Iranian strikes was true on Wednesday.

However, they then attacked leaks behind the release of the Intelligence Report, which undermines the president’s claims to the success of US strikes in Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Speaking on Wednesday in the Netherlands, where Trump attended the NATO summit, Defense Minister Pete Heget and Secretary of State Marco Rubio installed aggressive counter -counterparts after a preliminary rating of the Pentagon expired, the bombing probably put the nuclear output. Trump claims that strikes are “total charging”.

At the press conference, Heget said the information was likely to have leaked for political purposes and said the FBI was investigating the matter.

“We are now investigating the FBI leaks because this information is for internal purposes – an investigation into household damage – and CNN and others are trying to turn it to try to make the president look bad when it was a huge success,” Heget said.

“When you talk to the people who built the bombs, you understand what these bombs can do and deliver these bombs, they landed exactly where it was,” Heget continued. “And given 30,000 pounds of explosives and capabilities of these ammunition, it was a devastation under Ford.”

Over the weekend, Trump allows strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites-Forma, Nathan and Isfahan-using 30,000-pound bombs “Bunker-Bester”, which Trump claims to have devastated Iran’s nuclear program. But reports of a secret evaluation of early intelligence suggest that the attacks probably determine Iran’s nuclear program for only a few months instead of completely destroying it.

Daily Beast turned to the Pentagon for comment.

“The Amount of Munitions -Six Per Location – ASSESSMENT THAT TELLS YOU IT WAS Something Otherwise, Is Speculating with Other Motives, and We Know That, IT WHENY YOU ACTULY LOCK at Report –it Was Preliminary, It Was Low-Confidence, So You Make Assessments Based on What You Know, ”Hegseth Said, Also Apparently Apparent Referring to the New York Times The coverage of the report, claiming that the damage is said to be “moderate to heavy”.

He added that he believed that the damage was more “heavy and deleted”, declaring what he claims to be a “political motive” in the leak.

Rubio hit a tone tone, criticizing the leaks as “professional stability”.

“On this issue of intelligence – this is what is flowing, you tell you intelligence,” he said. “This is the game these people play. They read it and then come out and characterize it as they want.”

Rubio said “Iran’s conversion facility” would have to make a bomb, was “deleted. He then admitted that” everything in the world can be restored “, but claims that” we now know where it is and if they try to restore it, we will have options there. “

The heget and Rubio’s diatribe against the leak came after they were involved in an uncomfortable leakage of their own. Both were included in the chat of the alert group, which discussed sensitive details about the administration’s secret plans to achieve goals in Yemen, without anyone realizing that a journalist was also inadvertent to the group.

In the meantime, Trump acknowledged that the report was “correct”, but insisted that Iran’s nuclear plans had been canceled by “decades”. He also angrily threw himself at Scum, which revealed the report.

“CNN is scum, msdnc is scum, New York Times is scum. They are bad people, they are sick, “Trump was raging for reporters on Wednesday.

“What they did is that they tried to make this incredible victory in something less,” Trump continued. “The generals and all the people who did a good job are humiliated by those idiots in CNN who cannot receive ratings. [sic] The New York TimesWhich dies too. Without Trump you wouldn’t have New York Times.“