The New York judge counted after erupting during the school council meeting, asking his son to be baptized valedicorian

I need to know

• Long Beach City Court Judge Corey E. Klein was officially counted by the New York State Committee on Judicial Conduct

• The judge, who will maintain a position by 2034, was accused of using his title against a heated exchange during a school board meeting, where he complained that his son was not named Valedicorian

• Klein already has 30 days to appeal the decision

The New York judge was censorship after erupting during a school board meeting.

The State Committee on Judicial Conduct in New York confirmed through a press release on Monday, June 9, that Long Beach City Court judge Corey E. Klein was subordinated to “calling his court position in a personal issue related to his son”.

During a meeting of the local school board, which appeared live on YouTube on April 11, 2024, Klein took the microphone after the session was open to the public for questions. He announced that he wanted to “discuss the consequences of the policies of this council, as he was about Covid and the choice of vlediktorians.”

The judge continued to say that his son was “not chosen as a void -in -law because of the policies of this council”, adding that they “influence the impact[ed] One person and one person only this year, my son. “

Klein said his son was straightforward before he was cut.

“Do not try to outsmart me with the law,” the judge said when the chief asked the school district prosecutor if this was the exact place for Klein’s conversation, for an official written complaint reviewed by the Judicial Conduct Commission on February 2025.

At first glance, the judge’s microphone was ruled out while a member of the school board spoke. However, Klein could still be heard shouting in the background.

“If you are going to try to be a lawyer, then contact me and my title, well. Thank you,” Klein said.

“You can contact me, a lawyer as a judge,” he also said, according to the complaint, who also notes that Klein often uses the terms of a lawyer and an advisor to contact the lawyer.

At one point, Klein accused the board for “[trying] To fight your pit bull lawyer for me. “He also said,” I am sorry that your lawyer had to go to me when all I wanted to do was come here and politely address a simple question. “

He had the floor in about 20 minutes.

Never miss a history-register for the free daily newsletter for people to be up to the best of what people can offer, from celebrity news to insurmountable stories of human interest.

Against the backdrop of the outbreak, he was told that he “had the right to appeal” the decision for his son. However, this was not the place.

“Don’t try to close me,” Klein said, threatening to continue talking “all night”.

At one point, the lawyer noted that he “respects” Klein and demanded the same respect in return. He also turned to the repeated use of Klein by legal terminology, saying, “Your honor, at that moment we are not in court.”

In the Commission’s press release, it was noted that Klein “agreed with the urge.” The publication also notes that all 11 members agree with the determination, which was made on May 29, 2025.

He was also counted for the use of his office to help “know” to get out of the Matter of Movement.

Now that the determination is filed, Klein has 30 days to make an official appeal.

According to the State Commission in New York, the judge has held a position in the Long Beach City Court since 2015. He will remain a judge by the end of 2034.

“He corrodes public confidence in the judiciary when a judge occupies the prestige of the court position to develop private benefit,” said Commission administrator Robert H. Tebukjian for the publication.

Tembeckjian continued, adding, “doing this impulsive, in an obscene public dispute who should be honored with high school or as a service of parking ticket is particularly irresponsible.”

According to the Center for Judicial Ethics of the National Center for State Courts, Censure “is an official sanction for violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct.” While a judge who is censored “does not require suspension or removal,” the official question is “strict reproach”.

People turned to the United Judicial System in New York for comment, but were not heard during publication.

Read the original article about people